Author Archives: DENNIS JONES JOURNAL

How Sodium Channels Support Intelligent Design Theory

Sodium (Na) is an element that often has a plus sign (+) next to it depicting the fact that it has a positive charge.  Each element in the Periodic Table has a definitive set number of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  … Continue reading

Posted in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | Leave a comment

INTELLIGENT DESIGN THEORY EXPLAINED

TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS OF ID: 1. MECHANISM: ID as a mechanism in and of itself – Intelligent Design is the action and result of artificial intervention interrupting undirected natural processes, such as natural selection. 2. HYPOTHESIS: ID as a scientific hypothesis … Continue reading

Posted in ID THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY | Tagged | 26 Comments

Biophysicists Consider Tumor Suppressor Protein 53 To Be A Dimmer Switch

Protein 53 (or tumor protein 53), is a tumor suppressor protein that in humans is encoded by the TP53 gene.  Since 2003, biophysicists have referenced this protein 53 (p53) to be a rheostat, or dimmer switch in laymen terms.  Although … Continue reading

Posted in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | 3 Comments

STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS AGAINST ID THEORY

The most common arguments against Intelligent Design theory are logic fallacies, such as the following: 1. Red herring 2. Unfounded rhetoric. 3. Ad hominem 4. Special Pleading logic fallacy 5. Appeals to argument from ignorance logic fallacy 6. Hand-wave off … Continue reading

Posted in LOGIC FALLACIES | Leave a comment

Quantum Theory as Original Source of Information

ID Theory has nothing to do with creationism or a designer. There is no philosophical contemplation as to a designer any more than the Big Bang theory has anything to say about a banger. It is impossible to complain about … Continue reading

Aside | Posted on | 3 Comments

MANY MAINSTREAM SCIENTISTS ARE THEISTS

I constantly here about an erroneous belief that has no factual basis. The idea is that somehow creationism is inherently flawed. First of all, creationism is based upon religion. There are many religions that have creation stories, not just Judaism … Continue reading

Posted in RELIGIOUS, IDEOLOGICAL, AND SOCIOLOGICAL ISSUES | Leave a comment

The Intelligent Design Definition of DESIGN

There is design in nature, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080217143838.htm. Second, ID Theory is the study of design. More specifically, ID is the study of information (CSI) in the form of DNA in how it originated and increases in the genome of a population … Continue reading

Posted in ID THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY | 2 Comments

CDESIGN PROPONENTSISTS

CONTRASTING BIBLICAL CREATIONISM TO ID It is often said that Intelligent Design Theory is associated with creationism, and some even equate Intelligent Design to be creationism.  There’s no basis for this claim other than the ruling of Judge Jones in Kitzmiller … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | Leave a comment

BIOMIMETICS, BIOMIMICRY, AND BIO-INSPIRED TECHNOLOGY:

BIOMIMETICS and BIOMIMICRY: An engineered directional nanofilm mimics nature’s curious feats: http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-nanofilm-mimics-nature-curious-feats.html Woodpecker’s head inspires shock absorbers, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20088-woodpeckers-head-inspires-shock-absorbers.html and http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/woodpecker-drumming-inspires-shock-absorbing-system/ and http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/literature…/2011/02/10/woodpecker_drumming_inspires_shock_absor  This example is not exactly biomimicry, but similar in that it is using nature to produce a specific … Continue reading

Posted in BIO-INSPIRED TECHNOLOGY | 1 Comment

Kitzmiller v. Dover

Judge Jones is NEITHER a scientist qualified to render the opinion he wrote, or a theologian. Judge Jones is an attorney. Law has NOTHING to do with science or religion either. Dover was a case about CONSTITUTIONAL law as to … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | 2 Comments