Category Archives: KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES

MICHAEL BEHE ON THE WITNESS STAND

As most people are aware, Michael Behe championed the design-inspired ID Theory hypothesis of Irreducible Complexity.  Michael Behe testified as an expert witness in Kitzmiller v. Dover (2005).  Transcripts of all the testimony and proceedings of the Dover trial are … Continue reading

Posted in IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY, KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

CDESIGN PROPONENTSISTS

CONTRASTING BIBLICAL CREATIONISM TO ID It is often said that Intelligent Design Theory is associated with creationism, and some even equate Intelligent Design to be creationism.  There’s no basis for this claim other than the ruling of Judge Jones in Kitzmiller … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | Leave a comment

Kitzmiller v. Dover

Judge Jones is NEITHER a scientist qualified to render the opinion he wrote, or a theologian. Judge Jones is an attorney. Law has NOTHING to do with science or religion either. Dover was a case about CONSTITUTIONAL law as to … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | 2 Comments