Monthly Archives: May 2011

MANY MAINSTREAM SCIENTISTS ARE THEISTS

I constantly here about an erroneous belief that has no factual basis. The idea is that somehow creationism is inherently flawed. First of all, creationism is based upon religion. There are many religions that have creation stories, not just Judaism … Continue reading

Posted in RELIGIOUS, IDEOLOGICAL, AND SOCIOLOGICAL ISSUES | Leave a comment

The Intelligent Design Definition of DESIGN

There is design in nature, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080217143838.htm. Second, ID Theory is the study of design. More specifically, ID is the study of information (CSI) in the form of DNA in how it originated and increases in the genome of a population … Continue reading

Posted in ID THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY | 2 Comments

CDESIGN PROPONENTSISTS

CONTRASTING BIBLICAL CREATIONISM TO ID It is often said that Intelligent Design Theory is associated with creationism, and some even equate Intelligent Design to be creationism.  There’s no basis for this claim other than the ruling of Judge Jones in Kitzmiller … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | Leave a comment

BIOMIMETICS, BIOMIMICRY, AND BIO-INSPIRED TECHNOLOGY:

BIOMIMETICS and BIOMIMICRY: An engineered directional nanofilm mimics nature’s curious feats: http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-nanofilm-mimics-nature-curious-feats.html Woodpecker’s head inspires shock absorbers, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20088-woodpeckers-head-inspires-shock-absorbers.html and http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/woodpecker-drumming-inspires-shock-absorbing-system/ and http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/literature…/2011/02/10/woodpecker_drumming_inspires_shock_absor  This example is not exactly biomimicry, but similar in that it is using nature to produce a specific … Continue reading

Posted in BIO-INSPIRED TECHNOLOGY | 1 Comment

Kitzmiller v. Dover

Judge Jones is NEITHER a scientist qualified to render the opinion he wrote, or a theologian. Judge Jones is an attorney. Law has NOTHING to do with science or religion either. Dover was a case about CONSTITUTIONAL law as to … Continue reading

Posted in KITZMILLER V. DOVER AND LEGAL ISSUES | 2 Comments

EXTRATERRESTRIALS MIGHT BE THE SOURCE OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN

THE INTEREST OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN AND THE DISCOVERY INSTITUTE IN THE SEARCH FOR EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEINGS You can review the technical definitions of Intelligent Design here.  One of the very seriously taken conjectures presented by ID Theory is that space aliens … Continue reading

Posted in SETI | 1 Comment

Intelligent Design Theory Is About INFORMATION, Not Designers

Intelligent Design (ID) theory is about information, studying how information originates and increases in the genome of a population resulting in greater complexity. ID Theory offers a scientific theory, scientific hypotheses, and intelligent design is in and of itself a … Continue reading

Posted in ID THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY | 5 Comments

Neil deGrasse Tyson Lecture, Beyond Belief 2006

The Lecture The full lecture can be viewed here. In the middle of the lecture, Tyson provides an historical sketch of how Intelligent Design has been contemplated classically by some of the greatest scientists and brilliant minds who ever lived … Continue reading

Aside | Posted on by | 2 Comments

Mollusks Demonstrate Hi-Tech Eye Design

Human eyes are well-designed to see objects using light transmitted through air, but not through water, because light travels at a different speed through the two media. However, intertidal-dwelling marine mollusks called chitons can see equally well in both environments. … Continue reading

Posted in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | Leave a comment

Technical Definitions of Intelligent Design

General Definition of Intelligent Design: Intelligent Design is a study of information, especially complex specified information (CSI), that overlaps into several scientific research fields.  The focus is on how CSI in the form of DNA originates and increases in the … Continue reading

Posted in ID THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY | 3 Comments